Presidential Debate #1: More Lessons for Communications Pros
By Gene Marbach
While political debates can be great theater, such events also offer many lessons for those of us in the communications trade. Wednesday night’s Presidential debate was no exception.
While most of those who tuned into the debates did so to learn more about the candidates’ views on the issues, we communications pros tend to look for other things. We look at how the candidates answer the questions — are their answers crisp and to the point or are they rambling? We look at body language and the kind of presence the candidates project. Of course, we look for factual mistakes or gaffes – the proverbial “gotcha moment,” if you will.
I’ll leave it to others to determine the winner of the debate – that’s really not the point here. In addition to the substance of the debate, I was interested in the style of the participants. Some observations:
- Substance. It appeared to me that the President was “playing it safe” basically doing nothing to jeopardize his lead. He challenged contender Mitt Romney to provide specifics to his economic plans, which has been a recurring theme during this political season. For his part, Mr. Romney did offer specifics (perhaps not enough for some). Mr. Romney came off as a CEO, very much in command of the details, facts and figures. I believe he presented himself as a credible alternative for the future.
- Staying on Point. I’d be interested to learn how many times Mr. Romney used the word “jobs” during the course of the evening. Clearly, employment is on the minds of the electorate and presidential hopeful Romney took every opportunity to make sure the American public knew that he “gets it” by repeatedly returning the theme of creating jobs. Often criticized for being out of touch with mainstream America, Mr. Romney used the term “middle class” at least 19 times by some accounts, again driving home a key point. I suspect that there is a lot of subliminal activity at play here as well.
- Body Language. Much has been made of the President’s body language during the debate. At times, he clearly looked uncomfortable, even unhappy. He was often seen looking down. In contrast, Mr. Romney looked engaged and was looking at the President as he spoke. He wore a bit of a smile – not a smirk – which, I believe, conveyed his enthusiasm for being there.
- Using the Props. When asked about the role of government, Mr. Romney made good use of the scenery by referencing the Constitution which was used as a backdrop on the stage and reciting lines from it to make his point.
For Round Two, I suspect that President Obama will up his game (cue the theme music from “Rocky”). I can’t wait…






Who won the debate? Only the losers ask that question.
Or people who want opinions other than their own…
Hello Donna and “Unwashed,”
Thank you for reading and commenting.
I believe that the American people were the winners. In a free society, we get the chance to hear the issues debated and make an informed decision based on what we learn. Also encouraging is the fact that nearly 60 million of us tuned in.
Cheers,
Gene
Agreed – interest is high especially since we’ve not heard a plan or policy spelled out in 3.5 years.
If the president’s advisers told him to play it cool so he wouldn’t jeopardize his lead, they should be taken to the woodshed. I believe the president was uncomfortable because he wanted to get in there, but he held back because he was advised not to fight.
Hello Donna,
Thank you for reading and commenting.
I suspect you are right. My guess is that he was told to “act Presidential and stay above the fray.” Further, I suspect that Mr. Romney was told to go on the attack, befitting of his underdog status.
It will be interesting to see what changes President Obama makes for the next debate.
Thanks again.
Cheers,
Gene
The problem was that every time he ‘got in there’, his opponent out scored him on content and style. This type of forum does present the risk that Romney is actually honestly represented and that could mean trouble. Holding back may be Obama’s best option.